Skip to main content

States of Siege: State Universities Wage a Second War for Academic Independence

By Academic Observer Editorial Board

Gainesville, Fla. — When Harvard’s labs fell silent last week after the White House froze $2.3 billion in federal research grants, the news dominated national headlines. It was the most dramatic skirmish yet in President Trump’s widening campaign to remake higher education by tying federal dollars to ideological demands and by investigating more than 50 universities—public and private—for alleged “race-exclusionary practices”. (NPR)

Yet for the nation’s public institutions, Washington is only half the battlefield; on dozens of state-university campuses—many without endowments hefty enough to absorb a single missed payroll—the more relentless trench warfare is unfolding at home, where governors and legislatures now wield tuition dollars, trustee appointments, and even lesson plans as instruments of political control. From Tallahassee to Austin, Raleigh to Boise, statehouses are rewriting tenure rules, banning diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices, withholding line-item funds, and installing ideologically loyalist boards—local power plays that, though quieter than a headline-grabbing federal freeze, can reshape curricula, purge programs, and upend the very idea of shared governance. The result is a true two-front war for academic independence in which state universities must fend off federal leverage on one side and home-grown political agendas on the other, all while trying to keep classrooms open and payrolls met. Below are but some examples of such ongoing battles.

Florida: The Legislature That Writes the Syllabus​

The epicenter is Florida, where Senate Bill 266 (2023) bars any spending that “promotes or engages in political or social activism.” In April a federal judge refused to block the law while litigation proceeds, leaving in place a ban that has already stripped scores of courses from the general-education catalog and denied conference travel funds to political-science professor Sharon Austin because the event was deemed “DEI-related.” (Florida Phoenix, Florida Phoenix)

Six professors—spanning the University of Florida, Florida State, and Florida International—have sued, calling the statute a “viewpoint-discriminatory muzzle” that chills research and teaching. (ACLU of Florida) Meanwhile, Governor Ron DeSantis’s allies tightened their grip on the tiny New College of Florida by appointing conservative trustees who quickly voted to abolish the gender-studies major and replace the president. (opencampusmedia.org)

Students feel the squeeze as well. Last year the state university system ordered chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine to shut down, citing “terror-affiliated” activity—an unprecedented statewide ban on a student group. (Inside Higher Ed)

Texas: Compliance by Pink Slip​

If Florida pioneered the “abolish-and-replace” model, Texas has perfected compliance through attrition. Senate Bill 17, which took effect on Jan. 1 2024, forbids DEI programs at all public colleges. The University of Texas at Austin has since laid off more than 60 employees; statewide, the Associated Press counts over 100 lost jobs. (The Texas Tribune, AP News)

Administrators must file annual reports certifying that no funds flow to DEI work. Failure could trigger additional cuts from lawmakers who already wield the largest higher-ed purse in the nation. “We’re living under a permanent audit,” said a dean at UT-Arlington who asked not be named because his college’s next appropriation hearing is weeks away.

North Carolina: Ending Tenure, One Bill at a Time​

House Bill 715, the “Higher Education Modernization & Affordability Act,” would end tenure for faculty hired after July 1 2024 and replace it with renewable four-year contracts. More than 700 professors have signed petitions and the American Historical Association has fired off an open letter warning that abolishing tenure “erodes the intellectual independence on which a public university’s credibility rests.” (ABC11 Raleigh-Durham, AHA)

Even before HB 715, the UNC system’s Board of Governors had flexed new powers: trustees pushed through a School of Civic Life without standard faculty review, prompting the provost of UNC–Chapel Hill to resign. Faculty leaders say that episode proves lawmakers can now override curricular governance by stacking boards with political allies.

Idaho: Punishment by Budget and Board​

Idaho’s Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee voted in March to slash $2 million each from Boise State University and the University of Idaho—explicitly citing past DEI spending. (Idaho Capital Sun) But money is only half the drama. At North Idaho College (NIC), ideological board infighting has dragged the two-year institution to the brink of losing accreditation. Inside Higher Ed reports that the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities has given NIC until April 2025 to correct “governance dysfunction” or face disaccreditation. (Inside Higher Ed) The showdown began after far-right trustees gained a majority in 2022 and cycled through five presidents in 15 months, running up six-figure legal bills and prompting local employers to warn of a regional economic hit if the school collapses. (K99.1FM)

Arizona: Legislating Protest out of Existence​

In the wake of Gaza-related encampments, Arizona lawmakers fast-tracked House Bill 2880, which bans overnight encampments on any public-college campus and requires presidents to call police if tents re-appear. The bill passed April 30 and awaits Governor Katie Hobbs’s signature. Opponents argue it criminalizes a protest tradition older than the Vietnam era and deputizes university leaders as law-enforcement agents. (Capitol Times, KJZZ)

Arizona’s measure is one of 41 anti-protest bills introduced in 22 states this year, according to the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law’s protest-law tracker, many of them aimed squarely at state universities. (ICNL)

Patterns of Control​

Across these case studies, a common arsenal emerges:

  • Funding choke points. Line-item reductions (Idaho), zeroed-out DEI budgets (Florida, Texas) and travel-grant denials (Florida) pressure institutions to self-censor.

  • Structural rewiring. Politically driven trustee overhauls (Florida’s New College; NIC in Idaho) put long-term governance in partisan hands.

  • Curricular mandates and bans. Florida’s SB 266 forbids courses that “distort significant historical events,” while Texas legislators are mulling a companion bill that would police how race and gender are taught statewide. (The Texas Tribune)

  • Speech and protest restrictions. Arizona’s encampment ban and Florida’s SJP shutdown show how lawmakers move from regulating budgets to policing expression.

Why State Universities Feel It More​

Private institutions such as Harvard can sue the federal government, dip into endowments, or leverage alumni networks. Most state universities cannot. Boise State’s general fund, for instance, would have to choose between covering the recent DEI cut or replacing its 30-year-old chemistry fume hoods. At NIC, trustees’ legal bills have already forced the cancellation of five academic programs and a hiring freeze. (Higher Education News | Higher Ed Dive)

Moreover, state schools must answer to two masters: federal agencies that control Pell Grants and research dollars, and legislatures that supply operating funds, appoint trustees, and even approve building projects. “The board can gut your tenure policy at noon, and by four o’clock a federal audit can freeze your lab,” said Amna Khalid, an historian at Carleton College who tracks academic-freedom cases nationwide.

Resistance: Lawsuits, Coalitions and Quiet Exoduses​

Legal pushback is growing. Besides the Florida and North Carolina suits, the ACLU is assembling a multistate strategy to challenge DEI bans as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. Faculty senates in the Big Ten have floated a defense compact under which member schools will file amicus briefs whenever one is sued.

Yet many professors simply leave. UT-Austin reports that 23 tenure-track faculty accepted outside offers this year, the highest in a decade; exit interviews cite SB 17 as a primary reason. At UNC-Chapel Hill, graduate applications in history dropped 17 percent after HB 715 was filed. “Brain drain isn’t a metaphor,” said UNC historian Blair Kelley. “It’s a weekly event.”

What Comes Next?​

A bipartisan quartet in Congress is drafting an “Academic Independence Act” that would make some federal funds contingent on strong shared-governance protections. In Tallahassee, the SB 266 lawsuit could reach the Eleventh Circuit by year’s end, setting precedent across the Southeast. And Idaho’s accreditor will rule on NIC’s fate in April 2025—an early test of whether governance breakdown alone can shutter a public college.

For now, the map of academic freedom looks less like a red-blue divide than a mosaic of legislative experiments. As Harvard duels with Washington in federal court, its public-university counterparts are discovering that the most perilous threats to inquiry may come from closer to home.

**